▶ PLAY
SP 3:21:14
Reviews / Biography / Malcolm X

Throwback: Malcolm X — Norm Finds Religion, Matt Finds a Word He Can't Define

Dir. Spike Lee Runtime 3h 22m Reviewed Aug 10, 2026 Biography · Throwback · 1992
Matt
Thumb Down
Norm
Thumb Up
>> Official Verdict: Split Decision — The Feud Continues <<

Matt's Take

Thumb Down — Currently Under Internal Review

Let me start with what’s inarguable. Denzel Washington is towering — not playing Malcolm X so much as being gradually replaced by him over three hours and twenty-two minutes. Spike Lee stages the Harlem ballroom sequences like a symphony conductor with a grudge. Ernest Dickerson’s photography belongs in a museum, and so do the costumes. A 202-minute biographical epic that moves like a thriller. This is, technically, the exact movie I always say I want.

“Craft: impeccable. Performance: all-time. And yet I found the film — and I want to use this term with precision — ‘too woke.’”

I will not be defining that term. I learned it recently, I like the way it sounds, and I’ve decided it applies here. My position is that a three-and-a-half-hour biography of Malcolm X should not have this much Malcolm X in it. The film has a point of view about its own subject, which I found forward. Norm has already seen this paragraph and is currently drafting something unkind, so let me just say: the thumb is down, my reasoning is airtight, and I’d ask that no one check on it.

Norm's Take

Thumb Up — As High As It Goes

Once, maybe twice a decade, I sit in a chair for three hours and twenty-two minutes and do not once check my watch. This is one of those. Denzel Washington gives what I consider the single greatest screen performance I have ever rated — the con-man swagger, the prison stillness, the Mecca transformation, three different men wearing one face — and I say this as a man whose thumb has load-bearing rust on it.

“In 1993 the Academy gave Best Actor to Al Pacino for shouting ‘hoo-ah’ at furniture. Denzel Washington had just spent 202 minutes BECOMING Malcolm X. I will die angry about this.”

Scent of a Woman is a fine film. It is also the beneficiary of the most flagrant robbery in Oscar history, and the Academy knew it — that’s why they handed Denzel the make-good statue nine years later for Training Day. Drama, history, a towering lead, a runtime that keeps its promise, and not one wizard: this movie was built in a lab for me. Thumb up. All the way up. And as for my colleague’s take — see below, where I will be conducting his review’s autopsy.

The Crossfire

Where the critics stop reviewing the movie and start reviewing each other.
NormA historical epic. From 1992. Denzel. You have described this exact movie as "the reason cinema exists" on four separate occasions. Explain yourself.
MattI felt the film was politically forward for my tastes.
NormIt's a biography of Malcolm X, Matt. Being about Malcolm X is not a bias, it's the ASSIGNMENT. You're reviewing a 1992 film with a complaint you downloaded in 2019. Meanwhile you gave Fred Claus a thumbs up.
MattFred Claus has layers, and I've asked you repeatedly to leave it out of this.
NormThe layers are Vince Vaughn and regret. Ladies and gentlemen, the only review in this site's history where I'm the generous one. Print it. Frame it. It will not recur.